- Target equipment
- Equipment identified as inefficient through audits or inspections, and aging equipment under consideration for replacement
- Scope of work
- Scenario comparison → Operating condition optimization → Feasibility review → Installation specification development → Post-improvement verification
- Deliverables
- Scenario comparison table · Feasibility analysis report (investment cost, cost savings, and payback period) · Post-improvement verification report
- Integration
- If Energy Audit or Mechanical Equipment Performance Inspection results are available, we continue directly from those findings
If it ends with a report,
there will be no savings.
We develop improvement measures into installation specifications, then measure the same points again after installation.
We start with numbers and end with numbers.
Carbon-Neutral Facility Investment
Detailed Design Projects
Based on 11 detailed design projects
Based on 11 detailed design projects
What our clients saved
after replacing equipment.
These are detailed design projects completed under the Carbon-Neutral Facility Investment (Support Program).
Amounts are based on annual cost savings confirmed by each client.
Energy audit and variable-speed air compressor replacement
Emissions reduction 0Replacement with an inverter-controlled air compressor to eliminate unloaded operation
Emissions reduction 0Inverter-type screw compressor replacement integrated with wastewater recovery
Emissions reduction 0Process
Scenario Development
We identify all feasible improvement alternatives.
Quantitative Comparison
We compare cost savings, investment cost, and payback period.
Specification Development
We develop specifications that can be implemented on site.
Results Verification
After improvements, we remeasure the same points to quantify actual savings.
Before replacing equipment,
what to evaluate
Improvement Measure Selection
We select feasible measures from audit and inspection findings.
Improvement Measure Simulation
We calculate cost savings in a digital model before making changes.
Investment Feasibility Review
We calculate investment cost, cost savings, and payback period to determine whether to proceed.
Pre-Implementation Baseline
We measure pre-improvement performance to establish a comparison baseline.
Post-Improvement Verification
We remeasure the same points using the same method to quantify actual savings.
Ongoing Data Management
We continue monitoring operating data to confirm that savings are sustained.
Improvement Sites


What makes AERO-ONE different
- Primarily recommends equipment replacement
- Results estimated from catalog specifications
- Ends when installation is complete
- Actual savings are not measured
- Includes adjustments to operating conditions
- Simulation using our measured data
- Measurement before and after improvements using the same criteria
- Concludes by quantifying actual savings
Before replacing equipment,
PERFORMANCE RETROFIT — AERO-ONE
first determine whether the change is worth it.